Try to distill the article down to its “scientific essence.” Include all the key points and be accurate. A reader who has not read the original article should be able to understand your summary. Example of a well-written summary: The egg capsules of the marine snails Nucella lamellosa and N. File Size: KB 12/6/ · example of a critical review. PL4S Example: Critical Review of a Journal Article. Article: Carroll, J. (). Play Therapy: the children’s views, Child and Family Social Work, 7, pg This article is recent, published within a peer-reviewed journal. The author-conducted research is empirical, qualitative and phenomenologically designed 3/27/ · Journals Critical Review: [Essay Example], words GradesFixer. This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers
Journals Critical Review: [Essay Example], words GradesFixer
To browse Academia. edu and critical review of scientific paper example wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
Skip to main content. edu no longer supports Internet Explorer. Log In Sign Up. Download Free PDF. SAMPLE CRITICAL REVIEW. Yen Nguyen. Download PDF. Download Full PDF Package This paper. A short summary of this paper. READ PAPER. The last 20 years have seen a revolution in the way we communicate, all brought about by the quite extraordinary developments that have occurred in the field of information and communications technologies.
There is no doubt that the way people interact with each other nowadays -whether in business, education, in one's personal lifeis drastically different from the way things were done in the not-so-distant pre-digital past.
But have these developments been positive ones? Can we say that human relations have improved as a result of these changes?, critical review of scientific paper example. Sherry Turkle in her book Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other is quite sure that this is not the case.
In her study, based on interviews with users of technology across a wide spectrum of society, Turkle argues. that while it may appear that people are more in touch with each other, the effect paradoxically of all this new communication is that people are becoming more socially alienated.
Turkle quotes many stories from her interviews to illustrate her basic argument. In one worrying case, she describes the experience of a woman who goes to interview someone she is interested in employing as a nanny, critical review of scientific paper example. When the woman arrives at the apartment, critical review of scientific paper example, she meets the person's flatmate who at the time is texting on her BlackBerry.
The woman asks to see the would-be nanny. Rather than get up to knock on this person's doorwhich is only 15 feet awaythe flatmate sends her a text to tell of the woman's arrival.
They introduce the general SUBJECT area covered in the text the rise of digital communicationand also the main ISSUES being considered Have these technologies improved our relationships? Comment [T3]:At the end of this opening paragraph, the TEXT and its AUTHOR are introduced.
Comment [T4]:Once the text has been introduced, the main task is to SUMMARISE its contents. The first thing you need to do is have a go at outlining the author's main ARGUMENT; that is, what is the main point they are seeking to make in the text.
Comment [T5]: Along with outlining the author's ARGUMENT, you should also indicate what type of EVIDENCE is presented in the text to support this ARGUMENT call out to her. The flatmate objects: "Oh no", she says. That would be too intrusive" p. Part of the problem, according to Turkle, critical review of scientific paper example, is that with the various devices we now use to communicate, we are able to control the contact we have with others, and in effect to diminish the intimacy of our relationships.
We have many 'friends', but fewer genuine friendships, she argues. Another major concern of the author is the way that communications technology has come to overwhelm our lives. Turkle points out that it used to be the case that we kept computers busy; now the relationships is reversed, and it is they that keep us busy. This is seen in the growing phenomenon of multitasking.
Turkle quotes a number of examples of thisof a granddaughter who feels guilty for distractedly doing her emails while skyping with her sick grandmother; of participants at a conference being focused more on finessing their own upcoming presentations than paying attention to the speaker whose session they are in.
All this relentless communication, Turkle suggests, has lead to a perverse dependence on the technology: "whether or not our devices are in use, without them we feel disconnected, adrift" p. Turkle's argument is an interesting and challenging one, and she manages to draw on numerous real life stories to vividly illustrate her points. Many of these stories are familiar ones, and capture well the frustrations and annoyances many of us can feel when confronted with some of the less impressive uses of digital communications.
Another example she quotes is that of a brother who received the important, personal news of his sisters' engagement to be married via an email to a list of friends. The brother explained in interview that this was surely news that should have been conveyed intimately in a face-to-face situation, or at least in a phone call.
It is cases like these that drive home Turkle's main pointthat technology increasingly is reducing our relationships to mere connections: "We would rather text than talk", she explains p There are some problems however, with Turkle's argument. One of these concerns the evidence she uses to support her case. As noted, the main data used in her study are interviews with people from various walks of life about their experiences of digital technology. We note however, that virtually all the stories recounted in the chapter are ones that illustrate some personally dissatisfying experience.
One has the impression that Turkle is only interested in the negatives of the virtual world, and critical review of scientific paper example this sense the study seems a biased one. Contrary to Turkle's view on things, there is an emerging body of research that suggests that many people are not necessarily using the online world to supplant their face-to-face relationships, but instead using it to enhance and supplement these relationships Pollet Related to this problem of bias in her study are the limits of its scope.
Turkle is a psychoanalyst, critical review of scientific paper example, and so in her investigations she chooses to focus on the personal functionsand dysfunctionsof digital communications. This is an understandable emphasis. Her background however, critical review of scientific paper example, prevents her from considering some of the more critical review of scientific paper example social and political dimensions of the new technologies.
The recent experiences in a number of countries, where social media have played a major role in challengingif not overthrowing -Comment [T6]: This is a text mainly about 'concerns' that the author has about digital technology. The SUMMARY section of the review has been organised around this theme of "major concerns". When you are writing your own summary of a text you will need to pay attention to how you will STRUCTURE your understanding of he text.
You need to use these expressions a lot in the SUMMARY section of a review. Note that you do not need to provide an author, date reference in a review, only the page no. Note that the first criticism concerns Turkle's use of EVIDENCE. You will see that the rest of the review is organised around the various problems the student has identified in Turkle's text. This is often not a strict requirement, critical review of scientific paper example, but does serve as evidence of your own wider reading on the topic.
To refer to other works will always go down well with your lecturers. Another example of this use of OTHER SOURCES is seen at the end of the next paragraph. repressive governments, suggest that far from bringing about disconnection between people, these technologies have the capacity to connect and unite people in ways not previously seen Shirky A final shortcoming of the chapter is that it is hard to know where to go with Turkle's argument.
In expressing her concerns about the effects these technologies are having on our relationships, Turkle seems to wish that all these developments had never occurred. This is an unrealistic position. The new technologies are not going to go awayin fact, one assumes they will become more and more a part of our livesand so it seems a slightly pointless exercise to outline all sorts of reason why life would be better without them.
In summary, while Turkle's bookat least the extract I readis an critical review of scientific paper example and lively account of life in the digital age, it does offer a fairly one-sided view of her subject, and fails to recognise the many benefits that digital culture has brought.
One thought I had in writing this review, is that without these technologies, I would not have had such easy access to Turkle's book to read in the first place. Related Papers. Critical review task. By Becka Mills. By Cathy Lin. social media. By maimoona khalid. Master's Thesis: Social Media as a Performance Space. By Gabriela Simich. Computer Art and the Cosmopolitan Imagination. By Kathryn Brown. Download pdf. Log In with Facebook Log In with Google Sign Up with Critical review of scientific paper example. Remember me on this computer.
Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. Need an account? Click here to sign up. About Press Blog People Papers Job Board Advertise We're Hiring! Help Center Find new research papers in: Physics Chemistry Biology Health Sciences Critical review of scientific paper example Earth Sciences Cognitive Science Mathematics Computer Science.
Terms Privacy Copyright Academia ©
How to Write the Academic Critique Assignment--Critique of Academic Journal Article
, time: 16:49example of a critical review Essay - Words
A scientific literature review is a critical account of what has been published on a topic by accredited researchers. It may be: • A stand-alone assignment • An introduction to an essay, report, thesis, etc. • Part of research/grant proposals. Scientific Literature Review: Writing a literature review will: • Improve your topic knowledge • Provide File Size: 1MB to confirm that your notes are accurate.) Write out a quick “flow” diagram of the arti cle. which covers the main points of each paragraph. The point of the diagram should be. to show the READ PAPER. SAMPLE CRITICAL REVIEW. Yen Nguyen. The last 20 years have seen a revolution in the way we communicate, all brought about by the quite extraordinary developments that have occurred in the field of information and communications technologies.. There is no doubt that the way people interact with each other nowadays -whether in business
No comments:
Post a Comment